Bruce Goldberger expresses criticism for federal prosecutors in case against Roger Clemens

Testimonies of the famous toxicologist Bruce Goldberger will probably impact greatly on decision of the court in the case connected with Roger Clemens. Bruce Goldberger is the Professor of Pathology and Director of Toxicology at the University of Florida College of Medicine. This specialist testified on behalf of Roger Clemens. Although he was invited in order to replace Don Catlin, the director of the WADA UCLA Medicine, Goldberger’s testimonies didn’t correspond to those that are usually provided by anti-doping agencies. He testified on behalf of the accused sportsman.
Bruce Goldberger has gained his celebrity due to his appearing on various news programs. Even during such programs he doesn’t abstain from criticism. Bruce Goldberger criticized some anti-doping organizations, including the WADA.
Bruce Goldberger criticized feds in the case linked with Roger Clemens. They based on “beer can evidence” provided by McNamee to support that Roger Clemens administered steroids and HGH. Brian McNamee, the former personal coach of Roger Clemens, provided a beer can containing used needles and syringes that had traces of such steroids, as Sustanon, Primobolan Depot and Deca Durabolin and were mixed allegedly with Clemens’ blood.  The beer can was kept by McNamee over 6 years. The toxicologist argued that such basis wasn’t reasonable.
Bruce Goldberger confirmed that it was impossible to base on “beer can evidence”. He added that the accusation couldn’t be proven because the theory of contamination could present.
Thus, Bruce Goldberger didn’t support the evidence used by the government. Earlier he also expressed criticism linked with evidence used by several anti-doping agencies.
Some years ago the toxicologist Bruce Goldberger testified on behalf of the American cyclist Floyd Landis, when this sportsperson appealed positives for steroids. A WADA-accredited lab located in France found traces of exogenous testosterone; T: E ratio and carbon isotope ratio tests were utilized by the lab. Bruce Goldberger pronounced similar words and criticism during the appeal linked with Floyd Landis.
Goldberger claimed during an interview that the WADA utilized inadequate ways and violated rights of athletes in order to reach the success in anti-doping programs.
Floyd Landis lost his appeal and admitted that he had taken steroids, EPO and several other related medicines.
Nobody knows which results will be achieved by Roger Clemens. Will the government prove that he has lied before the Congress? Will he admit to doping? Or will be the results opposite?