Tom Verducci gives explanations about his vote for an admitted steroid user

Tom Verducci of Sports Illustrated says about debates related to rughts of steroid users to be voted into the Baseball Hall of Fame. But as it commonly happens, this explanation shows just confusion of writers about steroids.
The Baseball Writers Association of America (BWAA) is a professional association of baseball reporters who chose players for the National Baseball Hall of Fame. All reporters that are members of the BWAA already not less than 10 years have opportunity to vote for up to 10 players for the Hall of Fame.
Recently it was a debate between members of the BWAA. They discussed whether admitted or just suspected consumers of steroids and other forbidden preparations might entry into Cooperstown.
Members of the BWAA usually must comment their votes: they should explain why they have voted pro or contra certain questions. Some of them claim that doping destroys the integrity of sports and usage of banned products is frequently claimed by them to be immoral.
As for Tom Verducci, he doesn’t think that usage of steroids is necessarily a moral question. This writer says that steroids help consumers to take unfair advantage over those who don’t administrate prohibited medications. According to this writer, performance-enhancing drugs make competitions unfair. Thus, intake of banned medicines promotes unfairness in sports. That’s why Verducci denies any link between doping and morality. This sportswriter claims that it is a question that is linked with performance but not to morality. So, Verducci suggests that steroid users should not be allowed to be in the Hall of Fame. But he has voted for the admitted steroid user Jeff Bagwell. This sportsperson has acknowledged that he had taken androstenedione. It is necessary to note that this medication was not classified as an anabolic steroid, when Bagwell used it. According to the Control Act 2004, it is enumerated among forbidden products. Since it wasn’t legally considered to be a steroid, Verducci decided to vote for the consumer of this medication; however, it was always claimed to be an anabolic-androgenic steroid by scientists. Furthermore, it was said that Bagwell just became bigger but didn’t induce his performance due to intake of androstenedione.
Nevertheless, the decision of Verducci to vote for the admitted consumer of the steroid is quite controversial. The following question appears: “Maybe Verducci is not against usage of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs by sportspersons?” Since Verducci doesn’t agree that doping is a moral question, he may suggest that increase of performance is not a real problem.
Numerous people suppose that intake of steroids represents evil because they are illegal.